Harvesting
Negotiations with the Ontario Government A Basic Overview
1993
- Steve and Roddy Powley are charged by Conservation
Officers for hunting moose without a license
and unlawful possession of moose contrary
to Ontario’s Game and Fish Act.
Read
Powley stories here
1998
- Trial judge ruled that the Powley's have
a Métis right to hunt that is protected
by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The
charges were dismissed, but the Crown (Ontario
Government) appeals the decision. Read
Powley stories here
2000
- Ontario Superior Court of Justice confirmed
the trial decision and dismissed the Crown’s
appeal. The Crown (Ontario Government) appeals
the decision to the Ontario Court of
Appeal. Read
Powley stories here
2001
- Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the
earlier decisions and confirmed that the Powley's
have an Aboriginal right to hunt as Métis.
The Crown (Ontario Government) then appeals
to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Read Powley stories here
2003
- Supreme Court of Canada, in a unanimous
judgment, said that the Powley's, as members
of the Sault Ste Marie Métis community,
can exercise a Métis right to hunt
that is protected by s. 35. The Crown (Ontario
Government) cannot appeal the ruling any higher.
The Supreme Court urges all Provincial governments
to make Harvesting agreements with the Métis
Nation. Read
Powley stories here
2004
- The MNO and the Ontario Government reach
agreement on a Harvesting Policy for Métis
Citizens in Ontario.
Read stories from 2004 here
2005
- The Ontario Government fails to uphold the
agreement that they agreed and signed themselves
into. The MNR begins to charge MNO Harvesters,
protected by the binding Harvesting Agreement
that the Ontario Government and it's agency
ignore. Read
stories from 2005 here
2006
- The R v. Laurin, Lemieux and Lemieux
Métis Harvesting case is brought before
another Ontario court as the Crown is trying
to press charges against MNO Harvestors ...
again. Read
stories from 2006 here
2007
- The Ontario Court of Justice rules that
the historic harvesting agreement entered
into by the Métis Nation of Ontario
(MNO) and the Ontario Ministry of Natural
Resources (MNR) in 2004 is legally binding
on the Government of Ontario and that the
laying of charges by the MNR against three
Métis harvesters violated the terms
of that agreement. Read
stories from 2007 here
Former MNO President Tony Belcourt gives
his reaction to the R v. Laurin,
Lemieux and Lemieux Métis Harvesting case
ruling. More
videos here